RPM vs RPM max

Inland paddling
Post Reply
Joe L
Posts: 373
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Battle
Has thanked: 1 time

RPM vs RPM max

Post by Joe L »

Wondering what peoples opinions where on the RPM max compared to the normal RPM?
At 73 kilos guess I am pretty light for it, would it still be ok for some easy down river play?

Posts: 9
Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 3:52 pm

Re: RPM vs RPM max

Post by Catastronaut »

It's been a long time since I've paddled either, but the RPM max seemed huge compared to the RPM. I'm 6´3" and used to be 90-95kg at the time (~20 yrs ago). I could squeeze in the RPM and it was ridiculous good fun, stern squirts were effortless. The RPM max required some good eddyline or a lot of power/good technique to sink the stern.

To answer your question: I don't think the RPM max would make a lot of sense at your weight. I always thought, that the RPM/RPM max were good fun when driven in a slalomesque style. Never could cartwheel either, even though it had been done at the time... At your weight, I think it would be even challenging to sink the stern of the RPM max except in a few selected spots. Therefore (RPM max): Downriver play at 73kg: I don't think so. River running at 73 kg: probably ok, but don't expect sporty stern. At your weight I think you can forget about getting the bow under for cartwheels etc...

Palm Equipment
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 11:40 am

Re: RPM vs RPM max

Post by Palm Equipment »

RPM all the way if you are 73Kg. I'm 85 and it is the bee's knees.

Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:56 pm
Location: Bath

Re: RPM vs RPM max

Post by Ripley92 »

RPM max would be way to big! There is quite a difference! I'm 90 and usually go in a RPM for some easy play.

Posts: 469
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2002 5:23 pm

Re: RPM vs RPM max

Post by AlexC »

Why not borrow my RPM to help you decide.
Then if you want to buy it, you could do that too :-)

Alex in Manc

Post Reply

Return to “Whitewater and Touring”