British Canoeing AGM

Inland paddling
User avatar
Adrian Cooper
Posts: 9714
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 2:26 pm
Location: Buckinghamshire
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: British Canoeing AGM

Post by Adrian Cooper » Wed Mar 29, 2017 12:26 pm

I am sure many paddlers keep a logbook of their paddling like mountaineers do. Some for the purposes of their coaching records. Simply asking paddlers to supply this information would provide a potentially huge resource of historic usage which could support the argument. This would be a huge inputting task which would be more easily done by the individuals although this would reduce the quality of the response.

BC Waterways Env
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:37 am

Re: British Canoeing AGM

Post by BC Waterways Env » Wed Mar 29, 2017 1:12 pm

Adrian Cooper wrote:I am sure many paddlers keep a logbook of their paddling like mountaineers do. Some for the purposes of their coaching records. Simply asking paddlers to supply this information would provide a potentially huge resource of historic usage which could support the argument. This would be a huge inputting task which would be more easily done by the individuals although this would reduce the quality of the response.
Yes - I'm looking into ways of facilitating that, and having a system as open as possible. A few considerations to weigh up - ease of use, need for tight quality control etc.

I'd like this to be something everyone in the 'paddling community' can feel some ownership of.

User avatar
DaveBland
Posts: 3657
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:01 pm
Location: Calgary Canada
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: British Canoeing AGM

Post by DaveBland » Wed Mar 29, 2017 4:18 pm

Thanks for your replies Chris. It really is refreshing to hear and have engagement and feedback. Your answers to my questions made me happy.

Whilst this seems like a great idea it will be really useful to gather and prove a PRN on as many rivers as you can – I can't help thinking this inevitably downplays claims to PRN on those not 'proved'.

The benefit of a blanket 'PRN on all rivers' approach is that not only is it in line with Caffyn's work but is simple and clear. But as long as it isn't a shift towards grabbing as many rivers as we can that have access to them, and selling out on the rest, then I think this is a great idea.
dave

stonercanoe
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 4:26 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: British Canoeing AGM

Post by stonercanoe » Wed Mar 29, 2017 6:42 pm

Chris are you after specific things to back up our argument for PRN? Examples are; the Monnow at Skenfrith there is a medieval dock, this proves that the river was used for navigation for hundreds of years. Alfred Russell Wallace wrote in his autobiography that as a child he watched coracles being used on the river Usk at Usk. This world date it about 1820. Stuff like this?
Jason

User avatar
morsey
Posts: 6275
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 12:36 pm
Location: West Country :-)
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: British Canoeing AGM

Post by morsey » Thu Mar 30, 2017 11:27 am

The question is; Will BC be representative of, respondent to, and controlled more by a reflective of membership following this AGM? Or is the board still going to govern, effectively as and how they choose?

BC Waterways Env
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:37 am

Re: British Canoeing AGM

Post by BC Waterways Env » Thu Mar 30, 2017 11:55 am

stonercanoe wrote:Chris are you after specific things to back up our argument for PRN? Examples are; the Monnow at Skenfrith there is a medieval dock, this proves that the river was used for navigation for hundreds of years. Alfred Russell Wallace wrote in his autobiography that as a child he watched coracles being used on the river Usk at Usk. This world date it about 1820. Stuff like this?
Jason
Yes - exactly this kind of knowledge. The aim is to collate this so we have as much evidence prepared as possible. Also to identify gaps - so for example if we have the suggestions you've made below, but not the actual sources, we can put something in place to find them.

User avatar
morsey
Posts: 6275
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 12:36 pm
Location: West Country :-)
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: British Canoeing AGM

Post by morsey » Sun Apr 02, 2017 12:12 am


Dave Manby
Posts: 2013
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 10:36 am
Location: Llangollen
Been thanked: 10 times
Contact:

Re: British Canoeing AGM

Post by Dave Manby » Sun Apr 02, 2017 9:41 am

A very good piece and I recommend people read it all the way to the end! Morsey - maybe it should be re-posted under another topic title to get wider readership?
morsey wrote:Ring any similarities?

https://spark.adobe.com/page/0QN8kOi6YNKua/

User avatar
davebrads
Posts: 1810
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2002 11:42 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: British Canoeing AGM

Post by davebrads » Mon Apr 03, 2017 11:11 am

morsey wrote:Ring any similarities?

https://spark.adobe.com/page/0QN8kOi6YNKua/
I don't think so, apart from maybe the comments about intransigent old men. British Cycling was always about competition. They are now being pushed to be more active in the recreational side of the sport by Sport England but this is a recent change that seems to have come about from the realisation that producing more medallists in the Olympics doesn't seem to have translated into more people taking up sport. Producing athletes requires lots of resources and commitment not just from the governing bodies and sports clubs, but even more so from the athletes themselves and their families. Increasing recreational cycling has probably been seen as low hanging fruit requiring much less investment for a far greater increase in numbers.

In contrast British Canoeing is an umbrella body that has always included recreational and competitive disciplines. On the whole the competitive disciplines have been left to run themselves while the governing body has been more concerned with administration of the membership and recreational coaching. The funding that has come into the sport has mostly been streamed directly into the coaching of the Olympic disciplines with the two teams pretty much running as autonomous units under the oversight of the performance director. Perhaps because of the success of British Cycling these teams have looked to take it as a model for their activities, perhaps with the same issues.

I get the impression that British Canoeing is being pushed to smarten up its act on the recreational side for the same reasons that British Cycling has moved into recreational cycling and that is why we have seen the recent changes in personnel.
it's not a playboat, it's a river runner

User avatar
Adrian Cooper
Posts: 9714
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 2:26 pm
Location: Buckinghamshire
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: British Canoeing AGM

Post by Adrian Cooper » Mon Apr 03, 2017 12:20 pm

Reason for the recent board changes:

https://www.sportengland.org/media/3492 ... -and-9.pdf

User avatar
morsey
Posts: 6275
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 12:36 pm
Location: West Country :-)
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: British Canoeing AGM

Post by morsey » Mon Apr 03, 2017 2:27 pm

Adrian Cooper wrote:Reason for the recent board changes:
"Cash Cow"

Post Reply

Return to “Whitewater and Touring”