I spent an interesting day on a VHF course last weekend - for the Marine short-range licence thingie.
Picking up on the point regarding range and practicality of hand-helds as per an earlier topic here, the Coastguard chap running the course said that they regarded a hand-held as a valuable aid in emergency situations. He confirmed that they had been involved in several instances of talking to kayakers on the sea (in rescue, or just passing on progress reports etc).
The point he made of course was that the Coastguard aerials are high enough to get decent reception so unless you're "shaded" by something like a cliff or some other obstruction they should be good for 5 miles or so. Most of the coastline I was interestd in has reasonably decent coverage he says.
Vessel to vessel is different, and inevitably a sea kayak is at a disadvantage in a big sea. However, he suggested that if you can see your intended contact (the trawler bearing down on you!) then you should be able to make contact which could be useful in those circumstances.
Much of course depends on whether the skipper you want to contact is "listening" of course!
For that "cry for help" - the mayday or pan-pan call, then I feel fairly confident that the big coastguard aerial will pick it up. If I'm sitting on a rock below a big cliff on the north west of Scotland, that would of course be dependant on whetehr the aerials on the western isles were within range - hmmmmm. Back to passing ships.
On that subject, a considerable amount of the course was given to the new DSC sets and the magic "red button" with its facility to send a data-burst with all the necessary info regarding vessel identity and (if linked to GPS) exact location. The process does ideally include sending a speech transmission as well though (time allowing), so maybe the coming removal of the head-phone watch in 2/05 isn't the terrible loss that I have heard it being described as.
Obviously the same limitations apply in that someone, somewhere has to be able to receive the emergency transmission.
Clearly there are implications for sea-paddlers though and I got the impression that although there is a liason between the BCU and the Coastguard on this subject, they (the Coastguard) might have to look at this further and might need to take more account of the potential difficulties faced by sea paddlers from the point of view of using GPS linked to DSC radios, and also from the perspective of the availability of suitably equipped hand-held sets.
The GPS interface may not be that critical in reality though as he suggested that even a manually input co-ordinate would give them a target area and was suggesting that this be done during the course of a trip. (Perhaps start - lunch - stop point?)
From the persepctive of learning the "procedures" and the appropriate channels to use (and, importantly, NOT to use - 70 for example) it was very worthwhile indeed.
Recommended. There is a good reference book available from the RYA on the subject which makes worthwhile reading.
Although I've just got a VHF (and know of someone else who has too) it was second-hand. I do wonder about the wisdom of buying a new set (close on £250 ??) just at the moment.
With all that, as long as 16 is monitored by vessels (not necessarily as a dedicated watch) then it will still serve its purpose and it is still used as the emergency channel for sending the speech transmissions and as the general calling channel.
These are just my thoughts as a total novice to this - are there any views/comments from the more experienced? Anyone?
When I get a chance to use the VHF "on the water" I'll be better able to comment - hopefully not to cry for help though :D
Mike.
