Tumblehome - why have it?

One blade only

Tumblehome - why have it?

Postby mharrall » Fri May 06, 2005 12:20 pm

What is the idea behind the 'tumblehome' feature that some open boat have?

Martin
User avatar
mharrall
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:28 am
Location: Trowbridge Wilts. UK

Postby Dave Thomas » Fri May 06, 2005 12:28 pm

My understanding is that it as least partly to facilitate solo paddling by making it easier (for a given waterline beam) to place strokes over the gunwales while sitting centrally. But there may be other reasons/plus-points?

I guess one minus-point is that, if the boat is edged far enough for the tumble-home to reach the waterline, secondary stability can become compromised!

Dave Thomas
Dave Thomas
 
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 10:36 pm

Postby mharrall » Fri May 06, 2005 12:38 pm

Thanks, that makes sense.

Martin
User avatar
mharrall
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:28 am
Location: Trowbridge Wilts. UK

Tumblehome

Postby Andy(verygrubby) » Sat May 07, 2005 6:37 pm

I see Dave's point and I've heard the same thing, but this assumes that the shaft of the paddle is almost touching the gunwale, at a slight angle to the vertical. In reality, I thought the paddle shaft had to be vertical for the first half of the J-stroke. If it is to be vertical, you still have to clear 'the fat bit' at the waterline which means your top hand and the shaft is a few inches out from the gunwhale. This makes having tumblehome irrelevant surely ? I am inclined to think it might be more to do with secondary stability, but I'm not sure.
Andy(verygrubby)
 

Tumblehome

Postby Chris Bolton » Sat May 07, 2005 11:05 pm

I'm not sure either but have 2 suggestions:

You get a greater waterline beam but the weigh to any gear in the boat is nearer the centre. This thought is prompted by the only other vessels I can think of with tumblehome, Nelson-era fighting ships, with heavy canons on the upper decks.

It allows you to get the paddle shaft very close to the waterline beam, without catching your bottom hand on the boat/gunwale.

I don't know if Jim Wallis reads this section of the board - we could do with a Naval Architect's view!

Chris
Chris Bolton
 
Posts: 1582
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 11:33 pm
Location: NW England

Postby Geoff Seddon » Fri May 13, 2005 10:16 pm

What about "It looks right" usually a good test of design, or curves are stronger than flat sections. Beware, usually any post I make has the effect of killing a thread stone dead.
User avatar
Geoff Seddon
 
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Horwich

Tumblehome

Postby Crofty » Sat May 14, 2005 12:01 am

Hi
Is it not something to do with edging the boat over so you still have a round hull shape in contact with the water.
Crofty
Crofty
 

Postby mharrall » Mon May 16, 2005 9:29 am

Is it not something to do with edging the boat over so you still have a round hull shape in contact with the water


That also sounds plausible. Are there any level 5 open boater coaches out there that can give a deffinite answer?

Martin
User avatar
mharrall
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:28 am
Location: Trowbridge Wilts. UK

tumblehome

Postby adrian j pullin » Mon May 16, 2005 1:07 pm

Web search throws up these:

Tumblehome gives a narrower beam at the gunwales and allows for easier paddling, however stability will be decreased. [http://suoc.syr.edu/suoc/paddling/canoe_design.html]

The inward curve of the sides of some canoes is called tumblehome. It's used for two reasons:


1. Floppy materials like sheet aluminum need some curvature for strength. The alternative to tumblehome may be more ribs, hence more weight.

2. Tumblehome reduces the width of the canoe at the gunnels. Thus, you don't have to reach so far over the sides to paddle.
[http://gorp.away.com/gorp/publishers/ics/how_cano.htm]

Tumblehome and rough water do not mix. It literally guides waves into the canoe. However it does have its place as it allows you to place your paddle close to the hull when paddling which is the most efficient way to do it.
[http://www.hpcanoes.bizland.com/articles/equipment/hulldesign.html]

and about 500 others. All that I have read say some mix of the above.
User avatar
adrian j pullin
 
Posts: 1352
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2002 2:43 pm
Location: In reality: Wirral. In my dreams: Mull

Postby mharrall » Mon May 16, 2005 1:26 pm

Many thanks. I suppose I could have done that myself, just lazy I guess.

Martin
User avatar
mharrall
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:28 am
Location: Trowbridge Wilts. UK


Return to Canoes

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest