Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Whitewater and touring

Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby NickH » Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:30 pm

From Rafa Ortiz' facebook:

Recognise this anybody?
Image

Also, can you use an apostrophe in this way after a z? Ortiz's didn't feel elegant.
User avatar
NickH
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:11 pm

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby morsey » Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:20 pm

At first look, it would be the Ula portage/used to be portage.
User avatar
morsey
 
Posts: 5165
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 1:36 pm
Location: West Country :-)

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby james fleming » Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:23 pm

Rafa Ortiz dropping 186 foot down Palouse Falls!

Absolutely fantastic achievement! The second person to do this.

What's next?
User avatar
james fleming
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:38 pm
Location: Braehead, Stirling, Scotland

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby morsey » Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:26 pm

I thought it would look a lot wider and bigger than that. Much respect for nailing that.
User avatar
morsey
 
Posts: 5165
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 1:36 pm
Location: West Country :-)

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby Patrick Clissold » Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:55 pm

Wow, excellent job.
User avatar
Patrick Clissold
 
Posts: 1594
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 6:38 pm
Location: Portsmouth

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby Mark R » Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:38 pm

Palouse Falls are sooooo 2010.
User avatar
Mark R
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22698
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 7:17 pm
Location: Dorset

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby banzer » Fri Apr 27, 2012 6:26 am

Seriously though.... T-Bradt must be very good at fastening his spraydeck / holding his nerve..... as far as I'm aware, he is the only one that paddles away from these biiig falls..... Rafa swam, Rush Sturges and Ed Lucero swan at Alexandra Falls, and that mad Brazilian over-the-handlebars dude swam at that one in Brazil....
A. Boater wrote:It's all Pierre's fault

www.neviscanoes.co.uk
User avatar
banzer
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 11:37 pm
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby morsey » Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:11 am

Banzer did you see the ratchet strap/hose pipe attachment Bradt used, to lock the spray deck in place on the rim? Think I would shape a block of foam to completely fill the cockpit and stop the deck imploding.
User avatar
morsey
 
Posts: 5165
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 1:36 pm
Location: West Country :-)

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby Tom_Laws » Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:03 am

morsey wrote: Think I would shape a block of foam to completely fill the cockpit and stop the deck imploding.



There's no need, if you are paddling off that, your balls would adaquately fill the space. Some very fine kayaking from Rafa there. Rush (pos on NatGeo) was talking about 200ft the other day, Argentina perhaps*?



*Might have made this up/dreamt it.
User avatar
Tom_Laws
 
Posts: 8115
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 8:37 am
Location: North Wales

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby Diamond Dave » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:04 am

Impressive indeed!

morsey wrote:Banzer did you see the ratchet strap/hose pipe attachment Bradt used, to lock the spray deck in place on the rim? Think I would shape a block of foam to completely fill the cockpit and stop the deck imploding.

They used the same thing on the Congo did they not?

Tom_Laws wrote:There's no need, if you are paddling off that, your balls would adaquately fill the space. Some very fine kayaking from Rafa there. Rush (pos on NatGeo) was talking about 200ft the other day, Argentina perhaps*?

*Might have made this up/dreamt it.


Not thinking of Kaiteur falls in Guyana? ~215m?
Image

So if it was lower water than Tyler did it meaning the hight of freefall was bigger, does that mean Rafa now holds the record...?? (Inot a serious question!)
Dave Burne
Full Facers - the way forward!
http://www.fourbordersexpedition.com
User avatar
Diamond Dave
 
Posts: 553
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:02 am

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby morsey » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:09 am

Semi serious answer: If you swim it does not count!
User avatar
morsey
 
Posts: 5165
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 1:36 pm
Location: West Country :-)

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby ianletton » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:18 am

morsey wrote:Semi serious answer: If you swim it does not count!


The thought did cross my mind....
IanLetton
User avatar
ianletton
 
Posts: 655
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:42 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby SPL » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:12 pm

I agree, otherwise anyone brave/stupid enough could do it.
SPL
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:23 pm

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby Chrace » Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:31 pm

Diamond Dave wrote:Not thinking of Kaiteur falls in Guyana? ~215m?
Image

Hope you mean feet, otherwise that's one mean drop!
Go on, sponsor us in memory of Jason Raper .. http://uk.virginmoneygiving.com/team/ForJason
User avatar
Chrace
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 3:47 pm
Location: York

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby james fleming » Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:41 pm

Erm, GULP! I think he does mean meters...
User avatar
james fleming
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:38 pm
Location: Braehead, Stirling, Scotland

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby Diamond Dave » Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:38 pm

Chrace wrote:
Diamond Dave wrote:Not thinking of Kaiteur falls in Guyana? ~215m?
Image

Hope you mean feet, otherwise that's one mean drop!

james fleming wrote:Erm, GULP! I think he does mean meters...

Aaah! Well, I did mean meters but in my head I was thinking in feet. So paddling this may be quite a way off yet then!
Maybe it was in Argentina then. And a 200footer, not 200m... My bad!
Dave Burne
Full Facers - the way forward!
http://www.fourbordersexpedition.com
User avatar
Diamond Dave
 
Posts: 553
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:02 am

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby RapidMediaTVGuy » Tue May 01, 2012 12:54 pm

Always wondered why if someone swims "it doesn't count"? Why is it okay to flip and still count then? The argument that if swimming 'counts' then anyone could huck themselves off waterfalls. Well, they could. There are lots of waterfalls that require no entry moves and gravity will take over. In my opinion a 'successful' descent is one where you've placed your boat where you want it, set/adjusted the angle and entered the pool at the bottom in the position you had planned for. That to me is the skill involved, being able to not get ripped out of your boat is pretty much up to luck in my opinion (or maybe there is a butt clenching technique that I don't know about and Tyler does.....)

Rafa nailed his line exactly how he wanted to and got ripped out of his boat so in my mind it counts. I'd rather hit my line and swim than be way off and stay in my boat (think Pedro's brazillian half loop).

Either way glad he's all good.

Dan Caldwell
Rapid Media TV Guy
We Paddle. We Care.
http://www.rapidmedia.com
User avatar
RapidMediaTVGuy
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:27 pm

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby Jon Davies » Wed May 02, 2012 6:40 pm

At what height does terminal velocity take hold? Surely 189 feet is getting close so really going higher is no issue other than controling the angle as you fall!
Jon Davies
 
Posts: 162
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:45 am

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby DaveBland » Wed May 02, 2012 6:56 pm

RapidMediaTVGuy wrote:Always wondered why if someone swims "it doesn't count"?y


I think in most cases a swim is a fail, but when it comes to these... I think 'living' constitutes success.
dave
User avatar
DaveBland
 
Posts: 1879
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:01 pm
Location: left a bit

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby banzer » Wed May 02, 2012 7:11 pm

I've been to the Kaiteur Falls. They're pretty massive! Some nice chunky grade 4/5 in the gorge below too...
A. Boater wrote:It's all Pierre's fault

www.neviscanoes.co.uk
User avatar
banzer
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 11:37 pm
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby feelingjustfine » Wed May 02, 2012 11:59 pm

Stop making things up Banzer... you saw a picture of it and got confused.
dam the dart :)
User avatar
feelingjustfine
 
Posts: 2176
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 3:05 pm
Location: edinburgh

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby SwamP » Thu May 03, 2012 8:45 am

Swim is a fail!

If it isn't where do we draw the line?? Here's the answer, Adam Potter, 1000ft fall, no boat, no water...but he's a kayaker so it counts!...unless a swim is a fail! ;)
When can we start killing these pretenders?
User avatar
SwamP
 
Posts: 3064
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:14 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby RapidMediaTVGuy » Thu May 03, 2012 4:59 pm

So if a swim is a fail how come a flip isn't? Are you supposed to flip when running rapids?

Dan C
Rapid Media TV Guy
We Paddle. We Care.
http://www.rapidmedia.com
User avatar
RapidMediaTVGuy
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:27 pm

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby DaveBland » Thu May 03, 2012 5:06 pm

RapidMediaTVGuy wrote:So if a swim is a fail how come a flip isn't? Are you supposed to flip when running rapids?

Dan C
Rapid Media TV Guy


Ultimately staying in your boat constitutes kayaking. If you're not in it, you're not kayaking are you? It can be argued that a roll is just another stroke. I think you have to draw a line somewhere as to what's a successful descent and what isn't. If it's on normal rivers [so outside of mega falls] then staying in your boat would seem to be a sensible place to draw that line.

But of course there's always a get-out clause for equipment failure.
dave
User avatar
DaveBland
 
Posts: 1879
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:01 pm
Location: left a bit

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby DaveBland » Thu May 03, 2012 5:34 pm

RapidMediaTVGuy wrote:So if a swim is a fail how come a flip isn't?...
Dan C
Rapid Media TV Guy


If a flip was a fail, then all playboaters would be a losers... no wait...
dave
User avatar
DaveBland
 
Posts: 1879
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:01 pm
Location: left a bit

Re: Descent number 2! Somebody's done it again!

Postby feelingjustfine » Thu May 03, 2012 7:35 pm

RapidMediaTVGuy wrote:So if a swim is a fail how come a flip isn't? Are you supposed to flip when running rapids?

Dan C
Rapid Media TV Guy


I think that kayaking is failing in general...know what I mean big man?
dam the dart :)
User avatar
feelingjustfine
 
Posts: 2176
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 3:05 pm
Location: edinburgh


Return to Inland

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Carter, Google [Bot] and 8 guests