Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Whitewater and touring

Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby SimonMW » Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:13 am

I feel like a change of boat. Up until now I've had a creeker, but I think I'm looking for something more "all round". Though kayaking does seem to be quite specialised these days. I think that paddling a creek tub all the time might be holding my experience back. I'm not after a playboat though, and as my main general purpose boat I don't want it to be stern squirting me up vertical all the time either.

Thing is I think I want a boat with some rails. Something I can run most rivers with up to G4, but that won't be spongey and lifeless on G2. Something I can progress my kayaking in. But at the same time if I'm invited to go to the Upper Dart, a boat that won't get reactions such as "you're not going in THAT are you?!"

I had been looking into a Fluid Detox medium, but used ones seem rarer than hens teeth. I love the look of it though. Another option is a Fluid Spice medium. My only gripes are that it looks like a shoe and it is quite narrow (I like boats to look sleek, not like "kayak contraption objects"). Varun looks interesting, though is this closer to an outright playboat compared to the Spice?

I know some may tell me just to get a creeker and a playboat, but I can only afford one boat at the moment once I have sold my current one. I'll have to be buying used, so boats like the new Jackson Zen, great though it looks, are out.

Oh, and one last thing about choosing a boat. Arrrrrrrrrrrrggggggghhhhhh!

PS: I don't want a Burn or a Mamba. Everybody and their dog has one these days.
SimonMW
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:39 pm

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Sickboy » Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:20 am

Axiom, Zone spring straight to mind, maybe a Jackson Fun, all capable of grade 4. Obviously you'll need to adjust your paddling style and this may take a little time depending on how lazy your creeker's made you.
Your doing the right thing though, you'll get technically better by giving the tubs a rest for a while.
Rum and coke, best served by the pint.
User avatar
Sickboy
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:44 pm
Location: se london

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Ricks-Freestyle-Mind » Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:25 am

Dagger Axiom. Great boat. Bit of extra length means more forward thinking at times - try one!
User avatar
Ricks-Freestyle-Mind
 
Posts: 3970
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 9:54 pm
Location: Bury/Preston

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Big Henry » Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:37 pm

SimonMW wrote:PS: I don't want a Burn or a Mamba. Everybody and their dog has one these days.

Maybe there's a reason they are so popular? I wouldn't rule out boats so quickly until you've tried them - you may find you think one of them is the next best think to sliced bread.
User avatar
Big Henry
 
Posts: 1671
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:31 am
Location: North East

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Mad_Erik » Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:19 pm

Big Henry wrote:
SimonMW wrote:PS: I don't want a Burn or a Mamba. Everybody and their dog has one these days.

Maybe there's a reason they are so popular? I wouldn't rule out boats so quickly until you've tried them - you may find you think one of them is the next best think to sliced bread.


I wouldn't call a Burn a creek boat anyway, more a river runner. I think of creek boats as big displacement hull beasts and Burns are far from that. Having said that you see a lot of Burns paddled very badly, some folks never find or use the rails.

As for whether or not a creek boat is 'a requirement'... I would say not in the UK. Do we have any 'creeks' in the UK? Burns etc are so popular in this country because they suit the water we have and give the average club paddler a good day out on G3/4 with a bit in reserve for the odd trip abroad on the more meaty creeky stuff.
I have a dog, his name is Erik.
Mad_Erik
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:40 pm

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby David Fairweather » Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:35 pm

Clearly I'm going to tell you to get a small Z:one. If you get yourself up to North Wales anytime soon, I'll sort you out a demo from somewhere.
User avatar
David Fairweather
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:04 pm
Location: Villars-sur-Ollons, Switzerland

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby 66quinny66 » Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:06 pm

I've got a large Z One and I love it.
66quinny66
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:24 pm
Location: Wirral

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby mills82 » Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:36 pm

How much have you got to spend? Could you not buy older boats to get them cheaper? You can get 2 older boats for £500 or less and you look retro in them aswell

As for a creekboat for what I do I have no need for it everytime I take mine out I look at everybody else and think oh if only I had my allstar.

Alot of people have bad things to say about it but I loved my ammo although I did still get bored in it. I also regret selling my LL CR125
mills82
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:34 pm

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby SimonMW » Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:10 pm

Clearly I'm going to tell you to get a small Z:one. If you get yourself up to North Wales anytime soon, I'll sort you out a demo from somewhere.


Z:one seems good. I actually paddled a medium when I did a day with Chris back when I first started paddling, but I didn't know enough about the intricacies of handling, hull differences etc to make a proper judgement. I'm appreciating things differently now. The Axiom seems pretty nice. The more I look into things, the more I agree with a friend of mine who thinks that you need three boats minimum.
SimonMW
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:39 pm

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby sprintpaddler » Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:46 pm

Hi Simon,
Agree with the above about the Burn. You dismiss this boat at your peril!! Seriously it`s an incredible boat & since buying mine my paddling has improved vastly. Sure there are loads of great boats to choose from, but with those sharpe rails & wide flat bottom, I`ve found the handling of it like no other. There seem to be so much scope for improvement built into it, that it`s a joy to go out virtually every trip, & find another string to it `s bow. It really does inspire confidence. Please try one!
Another boat I would recommend is the Everest. It won`t turn like a Burn, ( or at least as easily ) but it`s a faster boat with perhaps better capabilities in the bigger drops, & a knowledgeable coach at our club swears by it as a top all-rounder.
I`ve no affiliation to Pyranha whatsoever.

Cheers,
Ted.
sprintpaddler
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:13 pm
Location: SW

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Woods » Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:48 pm

The Fluid Donsa the most fun you can have on everything up to Nomad territory.
Failing that; a Necky Rip (did you say hen's teeth?); Necky Jive 8'10" (much more common on the secondhand market); or a Dagger Axiom.

Pete
User avatar
Woods
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:09 pm
Location: Bala

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Jim » Mon Mar 26, 2012 12:58 am

The Burn is bathtub, Glide all the way!
User avatar
Jim
 
Posts: 11098
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2002 2:14 pm
Location: Dumbarton

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Tea Boy Tom » Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:45 am

Q: Creekboats, a requirement or not? A: It depends. Given what you do at the moment, not really. As others have said, a Zone/Axiom style boat will be fine and great fun. I paddle a small Zone myself and it's excellent fun. However, with enough commitment and drive, 'creekboats' can be paddled in a very dynamic fasion.
User avatar
Tea Boy Tom
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:54 am
Location: N. Wales, amongst other places

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby justin-g » Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:53 am

I have creeker and an Axiom - in the UK I pretty much always use the Axiom unless I'm paddling GD5 stuff and even then sometimes use my Axiom. It's awesome - but it's not a creek boat - it gets pinned easier and is harder to paddle in the steep stuff. But it's brillaint for your skills and is amazing in big water like step 1 dart - it's like paddling a aston martin to the Nomads VW passat.

J
White water "rider"
User avatar
justin-g
 
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:58 pm
Location: Brizzle

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Tom_Laws » Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:53 am

Spent a summer running the Upper Dart, Mellte, Upper Tawe, Nedd Fechan etc in my Dagger RPM. An absolute hoot.
User avatar
Tom_Laws
 
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 8:37 am
Location: North Wales

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby SimonMW » Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:13 am

I have to say the Axiom is piquing my interest, along with the Z:one.

I hear the Axiom is difficult to boof, but I suppose that's a small compromise to make for the other capabilities. The Z:one though doesn't seem to have as much restriction from what I have seen of Dave going off ledges in one.

I'd always liked the look of the RPM, but it is full displacement, so the Axiom seems like a planing hulled version of that boat. One thing though regarding both the Z;one and the Axiom, is there enough room for any gear? Example if I wanted to put a DSLR in an Ocoee watershed bag?
SimonMW
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:39 pm

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Tom_Laws » Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:17 am

SimonMW wrote:I'd always liked the look of the RPM, but it is full displacement, so the Axiom seems like a planing hulled version of that boat. One thing though regarding both the Z;one and the Axiom, is there enough room for any gear? Example if I wanted to put a DSLR in an Ocoee watershed bag?



Pretty much - bit more footroom and a modern seating position.

The Axiom will take the smaller WS drybag behind the seat, I would imagine the Zon'e will too.
User avatar
Tom_Laws
 
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 8:37 am
Location: North Wales

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby GregS » Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:19 am

SimonMW wrote:Something I can run most rivers with up to G4, but that won't be spongey and lifeless on G2. Something I can progress my kayaking in.

Sounds like you should be paddling a competition slalom boat...
GregS
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:56 pm

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby sprintpaddler » Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:32 am

Jim wrote:The Burn is bathtub, Glide all the way!


Jim, get out of town matey! No way is the Burn a bathtub. It`s true I`ve havn`t the ability as yet to reach it`s potential, & admit it does look after you in the rough stuff ( a good thing me thinks ), but I`ve seen top paddlers do amazing manoevers in them. Think my recommendation is a good one for Simon, particularly as there`s room for his camera box:)

Cheers,
Ted.
sprintpaddler
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:13 pm
Location: SW

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby justin-g » Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:38 am

Axiom boofs like a dream - not sure where you heard that?? Tis me setting up for a boof on double drop on the east lyn....


Image
White water "rider"
User avatar
justin-g
 
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:58 pm
Location: Brizzle

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby dan dubya » Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:46 am

I recommend trying out the Jackson fun runner, its a very fast fun boat, I have paddled the small z one and axiom 8.0 also and found the fun runner to be a better size and for me than both of those boats also I found the axiom for me didn't have enough volume in the back end and the z one was a bit big but with some adjustments it would work I feel.



here is a little write up I did with some friends for my team.
http://squarerock.co.uk/2010/blog.php?s ... m=&ucat=2&

all these boats are very good it is about finding the boat that fits you and your paddling style.

and yes I am supported by SquareRock

dan
dan dubya
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:35 pm

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Tom_Laws » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:39 am

I'm NOT supported by SquareRock, I paddled the fun runner for a bit on Sunday, and I liked it, though if I had one I would change the footrest (good idea for a club boat though - old school ladder meets newschool thinking - faff free).

RPM blasts better though.
User avatar
Tom_Laws
 
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 8:37 am
Location: North Wales

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Adrian Cooper » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:56 am

That Fun Runner is so like the Z.one (after a cursory glance)
User avatar
Adrian Cooper
 
Posts: 8509
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 2:26 pm
Location: Bucks

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby justin-g » Mon Mar 26, 2012 12:25 pm

I tired the Fun at CIWW and really liked it - more playful than the Axiom for sure. But I got the Axiom for £450 new as a second and that pretty much swayed the arguement.
White water "rider"
User avatar
justin-g
 
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:58 pm
Location: Brizzle

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby SimonMW » Mon Mar 26, 2012 6:00 pm

The Axiom is definitely top of the list. The more I read, the more I like. I did actually have a short go in the 8.0 version once, but it was a bit too small for me, and I knew a lot less about boats back then. But the 8.5 seems like it would be a good bet.

Reading through the comments here and in other threads from the past it has allayed my fears that such a boat would not be good for harder rapids. It probably wouldn't be good for the Etive in full flow, but then I doubt I would ever paddle such a river anytime soon anyway!

So now I just need to find a used one (preferably in red), and at a good price. So if anyone knows anyone...
SimonMW
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:39 pm

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby lennart » Mon Mar 26, 2012 6:58 pm

you can still look at the detox and the spice. detox is a playboathull, nthat you need to drive. the spice is an easie funcrusiser. if you wnat to progess the detox is a great boat. it will keep you active. and edging properly.
the other called boats are going to get you forward as well.
try some or just take the plunge and paddle the boat for at least a year to live in it properly
Propper Writing in English, how do you do that, with dyslexia, bad hand eye coordination, ect. and in a foreign language
sorry fore all the mistakes.
lennart
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:36 pm
Location: netherlands

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby joules » Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:15 pm

Mmmm...I think the ideal is three boats:

1. Winter creeker type: bigger for all the duff we carry around and room for comfort, boots, LCD TV, pottie etc

2. 'Summer quirt boat like s6/s8 (cheap)...perfect for the G3 playspots like the T, Dee & surf a treat (sea and rivers)

3. Playboat; To hone boat trim skills and get a good thrashing at CIWW, HPP, The T, Dee etc.. whilst learning to Loop

Oh and a waveski for real carve and cut back on sea waves...


But not everyone has the space nor inclination...so the axiom genre is probably the best route here for a single boat...flat hull, rails, speed, bit of squirt for fun so that's the varun/loki/axiom/ type...so long as its tough enough for say a pin situation in winter and has rescue handles etc. Axiom ticks most boxes....
joules
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:24 pm

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Jim » Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:27 pm

sprintpaddler wrote:
Jim wrote:The Burn is bathtub, Glide all the way!


Jim, get out of town matey! No way is the Burn a bathtub.


OK, so you are cruising down the river in your burn and a nice green wave appears in front you do you:

A) Wavewheel it?
B) Paddle through flat and level and feel part of yourself die? (the fun part)
C) Get halfway through the double pump before remembering you are in a bathtub, try to abort and capsize embarrassingly
D) Get all the way through the double pump and throw the bow down straining something as the boat reminds you it's a bathtub, and capsize embarrassingly and in pain.

My experience of the burn is mostly C and D.

I should clarify that I outgrew my Glide and now use a Session+

I do not however encourage the OP to pick an out and out playboat at his stage of development, I am simply throwing into the mix that I still do not beleive creek boats are 'a requirement' despite Mr Westgarth's and Mr Rainsley's best attempts to prove otherwise to me :-)
User avatar
Jim
 
Posts: 11098
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2002 2:14 pm
Location: Dumbarton

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Ollie5 » Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:50 pm

Hi Simon,
Me and my 16 year old lad paddle the Upper Dart a fair bit when time allows and we use a Burn and Blistick Mac1 when its higher, but as soon as it drops to a couple inches below slab my playboat comes out, its hardwork but so much more fun! You can get around rocks easier, not get pinned and enjoy the experience, I am not the gretest paddler so anywhere around level I'm in the Burn. My lad however is far better than me and has done the Upper in his Varun when the slab is fully covered so depending on your age and ability and how much fun you want it can be done (I was speaking to someone who has done the Upper upto 3rd Arch in his G-Force!) My Burn feels too easy at times.
Ollie5
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Creekboats, a requirement or not?

Postby Ollie5 » Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:57 pm

2. 'Summer quirt boat like s6/s8 (cheap)...perfect for the G3 playspots like the T, Dee & surf a treat (sea and rivers)

I currently have a dilemna with my S6....brilliant surf boat but difficult in doing a river with Grade 4 rapids, looking at trying a LL C125 as a secondary boat.
Ollie5
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 4:16 pm

Next

Return to Inland

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dkel, ion, monkeypaddler, p.sanger, SnoWraith, Zool and 15 guests