CE on FB

Whitewater and touring

CE on FB

Postby TechnoEngineer » Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:58 pm

Removal of Comments, Posts & Discussions
by Canoe England on Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 1:50pm ·

Canoe England has reluctantly taken the decision to remove all the comments, posts & discussions from the Canoe England Facebook Page which we consider to be inappropriate.

From the relentless posting of demands, questions & complaints, often when answers have already been provided by Canoe England, it has become clear that Facebook is not an appropriate channel of communication through which to hold discussions about single issues.

Facebook is a social, not an anti-social, medium. The Canoe England Page was set up to promote canoeing & enable our sport to engage with others, to facilitate positive dialogue between different members and as a forum in which to share information, ideas & tips.

It was not set up as a replacement for more established channels of communication and, as the Social Media team have publicised on various occasions, should a response to a question be desired, other forms of communication, such as email, letter or phone, should be used in the first instance.

Canoe England is not, nor ever has been, a single campaign organisation and, as such, the organisation cannot allow any single issue to continue to dominate its Social Media; it has a duty to ensure other users aren’t discouraged from engaging with the Page by the occupation of any single topic.

Whilst we investigate alternative & more appropriate forms of communication (We are currently looking into the possibility of holding regular live web chats, amongst other ideas) all correspondence relating to Canoe England matters should be directed to:info@canoe-england.org.uk

We will aim to respond to all correspondence within 28 working days though should we receive a high volume of enquiries, such as that seen on the Canoe England Facebook Page in recent weeks, this may not be possible.

Wwe have a responsibility & and reserve the right to remove any content, and those who post it, from the Page. Please see our Social Media guidelines for further clarification at:

http://www.canoe-england.org.uk/media/p ... eb2012.pdf

Commenting is an integral part of the Canoe England Facebook Page and we encourage everyone to participate, contribute and connect with us and each other.
We value your comments on our Page and are constantly looking for ways to improve dialogue so we’ve put together the following guidelines on how to make the most of Canoe England Facebook conversation threads.
In addition to helping foster great conversation these guidelines, along with the context in which comments are made, are taken into account when we make decisions regarding the content on our Page.
We have a responsibility and reserve the right to remove any content, and those who post it, if we believe it to be compromising these guidelines.
Canoe England Facebook Page: Commenting Do’s & Don’ts
Do speak from relevant and personal experience that adds value to the conversation.
Don’t post comments or links that are irrelevant to the original post or conversation thread.
Don’t post spam.
Do help us maintain inviting interaction by self-policing threads and flagging spam. Although we have a hands-on approach to community engagement, we do sometimes miss things!
Don’t use the Canoe England Facebook Page to ask questions which would be better directed at the relevant Canoe England department. Use the Page as an opportunity to share tips, information & discussions with others that are interested in canoeing.
Don’t use offensive or profane language or threaten others. Maintain intelligent discussions by being respectful & considerate to both other Facebook users and Canoe England Facebook admin.
Do engage in polite and valuable conversation threads with fellow Facebook users and Canoe England Facebook Admin.
Don’t attack fellow Canoe England Facebook Users, staff or Facebook Admin.
If you disagree with something, we respect your opinion however we expect you to share your thoughts in a constructive and respectful manner. Don’t bully, intimidate or harass. We will distinguish between constructive arguments and smear tactics.
SuperHero / Monstar / Kodiak / My Videos
User avatar
TechnoEngineer
 
Posts: 2422
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 7:47 pm
Location: Hants, Berks, Herts

Re: CE on FB : ooooooooooOOOOOOOOOoooooooooo

Postby Strad » Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:00 pm

just read it - complete failure of how social media should be used....
Old School?? I miss my AQII..
Graham Stradling
User avatar
Strad
 
Posts: 1549
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 11:27 am
Location: Bristol(ish)

Re: CE on FB : ooooooooooOOOOOOOOOoooooooooo

Postby The Chuckster » Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:34 pm

TechnoEngineer wrote:Removal of Comments, Posts & Discussions
by Canoe England on Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 1:50pm ·

Canoe England is not, nor ever has been, a single campaign organisation and, as such, the organisation cannot allow any single issue to continue to dominate its Social Media; it has a duty to ensure other users aren’t discouraged from engaging with the Page by the occupation of any single topic.

[/quote]

So you can post up... really excited about the olympics, how do I get tickets?! By the way, what is your position about access?!!!
The Chuckster
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 2:18 pm

Re: CE on FB : ooooooooooOOOOOOOOOoooooooooo

Postby Tom_Laws » Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:43 pm

Jerks.

Join Canoe Wales. Move to Wales, Scotland or BC.
User avatar
Tom_Laws
 
Posts: 8115
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 8:37 am
Location: North Wales

Re: CE on FB : ooooooooooOOOOOOOOOoooooooooo

Postby Simon Westgarth » Tue Feb 21, 2012 4:00 pm

The era of Web 2.0 past the BCU by, such outlets like a blog on access, coaching and the alike, would of served them well to getting the kind of interaction, they clearly do not wish to engage in on their social media outlet. This has become an issue for an organisation that is trying to avoid direct two way communications, perhaps these failings will open them up to more proactive solutions rather than reacting against members questions in such a regressive manner.

PS, printing replies in Focus or CODE, does not help either, as no one really reads these publications. Without an editorial direction, both are print news outlets, when the web has announced it all months before.
User avatar
Simon Westgarth
 
Posts: 6014
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 5:05 pm
Location: Valsesia, Piemonte

Re: CE on FB

Postby lewis=) » Tue Feb 21, 2012 6:39 pm

Firstly I am appalled by this response to a reasonable question although the thread was starting to get a bit repetitive when I last checked it. I am not a member (I live in Scotland and therefore am a member of the SCA) As an outsider looking at this thread and others on this forum


"From the relentless posting of demands, questions & complaints, often when answers have already been provided by Canoe England, it has become clear that Facebook is not an appropriate channel of communication through which to hold discussions about single issues"

Yet that is what they seem to be doing with any other question that is asked mmmmm...........

"It was not set up as a replacement for more established channels of communication and, as the Social Media team have publicised on various occasions, should a response to a question be desired, other forms of communication, such as email, letter or phone, should be used in the first instance."


If an email is what they want give it to them,

First option - as one email with multiple signatures pretty sure if you can get a significant percentage of the membership to put there names to it they will have to do something.

Second option (this is slightly more militant) Someone writes a template and then everyone copy's it into there browser and emails it to them separately. I cant really see how this would work but it might irritate them enough to do something.

Third option is there someone out there with the skills to create an e- petition

"Canoe England is not, nor ever has been, a single campaign organisation and, as such, the organisation cannot allow any single issue to continue to dominate its Social Media
"

Even if the the majority of there members consider this to be the only issue they should be dealing with.
lewis=)
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: CE on FB

Postby Mark R » Tue Feb 21, 2012 7:10 pm

Words fail me.

What really amazes me, is that they've taken the time to go back and and delete all comments/ requests on the subject of access for some time back, including even the ones they themselves responded to constructively and helpfully.

All these posts were apparently 'inappropriate'.

Access to rivers is apparently an inappropriate subject for discussion with CE.
User avatar
Mark R
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22698
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 7:17 pm
Location: Dorset

Re: CE on FB

Postby Adrian Cooper » Tue Feb 21, 2012 7:14 pm

Sh, don't tell anyone, I've been adding some of mine back in.
User avatar
Adrian Cooper
 
Posts: 8513
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 2:26 pm
Location: Bucks

Re: CE on FB

Postby Scumbag_Scout » Tue Feb 21, 2012 7:57 pm

It's clear that Canoe England have no interest in representing the majority of their members, their interests remain in Olympic and Competition elements of the sport.

I don't see why we don't form another governing body that represents the average joe recreational paddler.

Anyone want to join the 'British Canoe Association '

Let the social media community form an official voice.
Scumbag_Scout
 
Posts: 1168
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:01 pm

Re: CE on FB

Postby Croft » Tue Feb 21, 2012 8:08 pm

Isn't this like a web-based version of what Cameron just did with his NHS summit - don't invite anybody along who doesn't agree with you - maybe they are just towing the official line!
Ian Beecroft - old-timer amateur boater
User avatar
Croft
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:54 am
Location: Valais, Switzerland

Re: CE on FB

Postby Simon Westgarth » Tue Feb 21, 2012 8:18 pm

Shocking, indeed. Print media is no longer an effective information flow for their membership, they have to get on with a better news feed, that has interaction, blogs are the best way forward, especially for single or narrow focus subjects like coaching & access. I hope CE get on the programme ASAP, as today's stance is regressive, it's an association that is answerable to its membership but a company trying to control it's public appearance.
User avatar
Simon Westgarth
 
Posts: 6014
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 5:05 pm
Location: Valsesia, Piemonte

Re: CE on FB

Postby buck197 » Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:10 pm

Looking at some of the questions there are common themes in a lot of them surely CE could answer these common themes. Maybe someone (Not you Mark) could assemble some generic questions from these questions for CE to focus on answering? Does CE think its members are happy with the status quo which to me we are obviously not and don't be surprised if they don't commission either:

a. A University to study access and VAA.
b. A members multi choice survey so we answer their questions and not vice versa.
c. A change to the coaching and award schemes.
Brian Taylor
Paddle Pirates
User avatar
buck197
 
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:25 pm
Location: Plymouth

Re: CE on FB

Postby hodgkins » Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:25 pm

TechnoEngineer wrote:It was not set up as a replacement for more established channels of communication


They clearly don't understand what Web2.0 is all about. I'm sure deep down First Great Western https://www.facebook.com/FirstGreatWestern wish facebook didn't exist, but at least they've embraced it and don't dare delete posts they don't like. I'm sure there's plenty other organisations in the same boat too.

If CE don't like the idea of lots of comments on their facebook page, how about setting up a web petition? This would hopefully show there is a large number of CE members who feel passionately about the access situation and cannot be ignored or deleted one by one as the emails/comments are made.
User avatar
hodgkins
 
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 5:51 pm
Location: Abingdon, Oxon.

Re: CE on FB

Postby Tom_Laws » Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:59 pm

These guys are much more switched on.

Click Here
User avatar
Tom_Laws
 
Posts: 8115
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 8:37 am
Location: North Wales

Re: CE on FB

Postby Chris Bolton » Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:34 pm

Canoe England wrote:should a response to a question be desired, other forms of communication, such as email, letter or phone, should be used in the first instance.
So why, I wonder, did I my three emails, politely asking a reasonable and relevant question [were CE planning to respond to the consultation on reorganising the Coastguard?] get no reply whatever?

Chris
Chris Bolton
 
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 11:33 pm
Location: NW England

Re: CE on FB

Postby ChrisE » Tue Feb 21, 2012 11:58 pm

buck197 wrote:Looking at some of the questions there are common themes in a lot of them surely CE could answer these common themes. Maybe someone (Not you Mark) could assemble some generic questions from these questions for CE to focus on answering?


well it would have been possible but it's not anymore, cos all the comments have been removed.
ChrisE
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:59 am

Re: CE on FB

Postby quicky » Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:17 am

"Asking Questions is not a crime".....
User avatar
quicky
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Wirral,

Re: CE on FB

Postby morsey » Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:27 am

quicky wrote:"Asking Questions is not a crime".....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2nCsqujCsQ
User avatar
morsey
 
Posts: 5171
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 1:36 pm
Location: West Country :-)

Re: CE on FB

Postby quicky » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:01 am

Brilliant Morsey...

"Then they paddled away".......

Someone will have a tired delete finger today on FB...
User avatar
quicky
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Wirral,

Re: CE on FB

Postby quicky » Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:41 am

I keep getting the Muppets, 'Man or Muppet' from the new film going round in my head in relation to this...
User avatar
quicky
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Wirral,

Re: CE on FB

Postby shanclan » Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:45 am

Muppetry of the first order.

Join Canoe Wales.
User avatar
shanclan
 
Posts: 959
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:57 pm
Location: Monmouth

Re: CE on FB

Postby quicky » Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:00 am

Apparently you can't if your a CE coach, despite the fact my club is Welsh....
User avatar
quicky
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Wirral,

Re: CE on FB

Postby Performance Kayaks » Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:20 am

As a retailer, the BCU wishes us to promote them to the public as their National Governing Body and demands that we give their members a discount. A few things have occurred to me regarding this:

I would estimate that about <90% of my NEW Recreational Paddles join for the main reason of access to waterways.
Maybe 10% are coaches.
I would also estimate that less than >1% of my customers are Competitive Paddlers.

Why should I promote an NGB that doesn't want to hear issues and gives the impression that it is not interested in supporting a vast majority of its membership?
User avatar
Performance Kayaks
 
Posts: 879
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:01 pm
Location: Weston-super-Mud, Somerset

Re: CE on FB

Postby Tom_Laws » Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:39 am

You've got your canals liscence. Stop your whining.
User avatar
Tom_Laws
 
Posts: 8115
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 8:37 am
Location: North Wales

Re: CE on FB

Postby Big Henry » Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:32 pm

Just to divert the thread for a bit...

I believe that Canoe England is in receipt of money from the taxpayer. Does this mean it becomes liable to answering questions under the Freedom of Information Act?
User avatar
Big Henry
 
Posts: 1672
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:31 am
Location: North East

Re: CE on FB

Postby quicky » Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:40 pm

From FB.

Canoe England
Clearly there are lots of people who are passionate about access to waterways. As are we. It is good to hear your comments and thoughts.
Specific questions can be directed to access@canoe-england.org.uk

Going to be a full mailbox...

http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/campai ... ation.html

Organisations subject to the Act are obliged to respond to requests within 20 working days of receiving them.
However, such laws continue to be ignored by a number of bodies, and they sometimes deliver incorrect or late information.
User avatar
quicky
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Wirral,

Re: CE on FB

Postby whosthedaddy » Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:43 pm

Third option is there someone out there with the skills to create an e- petition


You could try this:
http://epetitions.net/

Never used it but it might be worth a try. If a petition was successful then it lends weight to the opinions that access is an important issue for the recreational paddler. CE seem to think it is just a small group of troublemakers trying to bring their fb page down.

I would start it myself, but I am not confident I have the experience and full facts of the issue. It would also need careful wording such that it can be distributed to canoe and kayak clubs across the UK.

I would be willing to take a share in publicising the existence of such a petition.
whosthedaddy
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 9:16 am

Re: CE on FB

Postby quicky » Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:54 pm

petitions have been tried, (look at the number 10 site) and the 38 degress campaign with very limited respondants.
User avatar
quicky
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Wirral,

Re: CE on FB

Postby whosthedaddy » Wed Feb 22, 2012 3:12 pm

You need to demonstrate the support of the recreational paddlers somehow.

If a petition was created and well publicised (in the paddling press, clubs, retailers, blogs etc) but still the response is poor then the only conclusion is that it isn't in fact a big issue for most people and the BCU have won.

I don't think this is the case.

I am reminded of the campaign to influence the re-development of HPP. There was a huge response, with the result that the course was kept deep and many of the features retained and enhanced.
whosthedaddy
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 9:16 am

Re: CE on FB

Postby morsey » Wed Feb 22, 2012 3:27 pm

whosthedaddy wrote:I am reminded of the campaign to influence the re-development of HPP. There was a huge response, with the result that the course was kept deep and many of the features retained and enhanced.
I'm not so sure that is a true reflection of that situation, the course was developed by experts and the course was always going to be good after the work was carried out, I don't think it needed or had any alterations from the plans. The stumbling block, was the communication, or lack of it, as to the actual aspect of the redevelopment. The information was available it just wasn't passed to all paddlers. Lack of comms and BCU, now there is a shocker!
User avatar
morsey
 
Posts: 5171
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 1:36 pm
Location: West Country :-)

Next

Return to Inland

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests