Paul Smith wrote:simon d westgarth wrote: Currently I am holding my tongue of an outragious development with the Advanced WWS&R, details to come if no parity on the matter are forthcoming.
As you have now mentioned it, you may as well spill the beans! Besides it can't be any worse than the draft that I saw back in October. With loads of big gaps in it.
On about a slightly different note, what is your view Simon on training and assessing the same candidates at 4* or even 5*?
Nothing quite yet Paul, although I do agree that the draft syllabus for the new Advanced WWS&R was very much left field in terms of content. Another slightly more pressing matter has come to light and am awaiting a reply before I say anything else.
For both 4 and 5 Star training and most recreational coaching done these days in the UK, there is little in the way of individual focused long term development with a specific paddler and coach, and as such there is less likely to be a paddler only having their sole training and coaching from the same coach. In addition the development required from training and assessment almost will certainly bring the paddler into contact with other coaches. Plus both 4 and 5 Star Assessment require 2 different assessors to uphold a level of parity and to ensure the standard of the ward is robust. Therefore in conclusion, I do not feel that there is a conflict of interest if your same trainer is your assessor for any of the awards where there is a period of development required and an additional assessor is required to ensure everything is as objective as the assessment can be.