I think you would be spot on in saying we don't have any volunteers on the committee that can do this sort of stuff.
Can you confirm that the online booking is delegated to an outside organisation ? If so, I suspect that fixing the system will be a lot harder than fixing a system to which you have full admin access, but replacing it with such a system would be vastly more work :-(
Online sales are used so that we can sort as much stuff out before the event as possible.
Very much so - it's an excellent idea which I fully support, but if a system doesn't work when you have someone stood in front of you, you can usually sort something out. When it's a faceless computer, late at night, with no-one to contact for immediate support, it makes the whole thing infinitely frustrating.
'team of idiots?' I'm sure the guys that have been involved with wet west for years just feel so warm and fuzzy inside when they hear this stuff.
I was specifically referring to the software people, who, it would appear, aren't anything to do with SCA. I apologise if any SCA volunteer feels aggrieved by this characterisation of that part of the process... I guess it's just a strung out line of communication from frustrated end users via intermediaries to the website people. "Send three and fourpence, we're going to a dance" and all that...
However, even if SCA can't do the software and must delegate, it would be helpful if they did, or found a volunteer to do, some testing of the process, with various different browsers on various different machines, and various different likely usage scenarios, including groups with under-16s, mixed membership profiles, and so on. Such volunteers would not need to be techies - indeed the system has to work for people who aren't IT gurus - but having someone with IT expertise who could better characterise the issues with the provider would probably help, too. If you're fixing a problem, it helps to get good reports saying exactly what happened, why it's wrong, and what would have been correct. Which would, in turn, only be useful if there was a channel for such a tester to get the issues fixed. My feedback last year drew attention to similar issues, and it does seem that some effort has been made to address those, but no-one got in touch with me to ask for more details about the issues I experienced, which is suggestive of a less than perfect quality assurance process. The rule which works well in open-source software is that if someone reports a fault, include them in the process of getting it fixed, so you get to find out if the issue really has been addressed (and may find out about new ones).
If anyone does have the expertise (or just wants to help out in general) and would like to join the committee then we would LOVE to have you on board.
I suspect that I don't have the expertise to set up a booking system from scratch, and your provider may not welcome help (or even want to deal with a small client with increasingly difficult requirements), but I am more than happy to provide additional feedback on what did and didn't work, what a better system would look like. My expertise is in making faults reproducible, documenting what I did to make a fault happen, and so on. Simply setting up a fault-reporting system via a link on the booking page would be a good start - that way at least you would start to see how many people were having problems, know if you were actually losing bookings and so on. Since the link could be back to SCA's own site, that is something which would be easier to set up without needing to ask for changes on the provider booking system. Armed with feedback from a bigger sample of users, it would be easier to take the issues back to the booking people. Who knows, maybe they are losing customers from other events they serve and would find the feedback useful...
The committee will be looking into paypal for next year's events.
It's a useful alternative, but not everyone uses (or trusts) it. And paypal doesn't work well with all browsers, either, and you have no chance of getting that fixed :-(
Another suggestion, which wouldn't save you quite as much work, but would at least get the bookings in advance so the work was shifted away from the weekend of the event would be to provide a downloadable booking form, which people could send in by post, making it easier to book for groups all with one payment.
If anyone has any troubles then why not email the SCA direct?
A link to do just that from any (or possibly all?) of the booking pages would probably be useful in getting you better feedback. On the other hand, you might just prefer to get feedback a while later when users have had time to be less frustrated and provide a more considered description of the problems :-) I do realise that providing an email address on a website is asking to get a load of spam, so I can sympathise with not wanting to make this too obvious :-(
But I get the jist, it's a bit unreliable.
Yes. But "a bit unreliable" manifests as working fine for a lot of people, and simply not working at all for a few. If it was just averagely a bit unreliable for everyone, maybe that would not seem so bad !
I hope some of the above will be seen as constructive and not just volunteer-bashing - I really would rather see an easy-to-use system than make anyone feel bad about what you already have which undoubtedly works OK for a large subset of potential paddlers.
PM me if you want my email address to include me in the ongoing process of improving your booking system - the ones I used during the booking process are purely temporary ones.
Andy